))
Podcast Series: "Antonio Takes the Bar" EP 2
Manage episode 436586789 series 3594668
เนื้อหาจัดทำโดย Blvck Media LLC เนื้อหาพอดแคสต์ทั้งหมด รวมถึงตอน กราฟิก และคำอธิบายพอดแคสต์ได้รับการอัปโหลดและจัดหาให้โดยตรงจาก Blvck Media LLC หรือพันธมิตรแพลตฟอร์มพอดแคสต์ของพวกเขา หากคุณเชื่อว่ามีบุคคลอื่นใช้งานที่มีลิขสิทธิ์ของคุณโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาต คุณสามารถปฏิบัติตามขั้นตอนที่แสดงไว้ที่นี่ https://th.player.fm/legal
A homeowner, Alice, entered into a contract with Bob, for the renovation of her kitchen. The contract stipulated that Bob would complete the renovation within 3 months for a total cost of $30,000, with $10,000 due upon signing, $10,000 halfway, and the final $10,000 upon completion.
After signing the contract, Alice paid the initial $10,000. However, halfway through the project, Bob informed Alice that due to unforeseen circumstances, he would need an additional $5,000 to complete the job. Alice, eager to finish the renovation, agreed verbally to pay the extra amount but did not amend the written contract. Bob completed the work, but when he presented his final bill for $35,000, Alice refused to pay the additional $5,000, arguing that the original contract was for $30,000.
Is Alice legally obligated to pay Bob the additional $5,000?
A. Yes, because the verbal agreement to modify the contract is enforceable.
B. No, because the modification of the contract required written consent under the statute of frauds.
C. Yes, because Bob completed the work as despite the additional cost.
D. No, because unilateral modifications to a contract are not enforceable without consideration from both parties.
E. Yes, because Alice's payment of the initial $10,000 constitutes acceptance of all future modifications.
The content of this podcast is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For our full disclaimer, please visit theblvckbar.com
12 ตอน
แบ่งปัน
