Artwork

เนื้อหาจัดทำโดย information labs and Information labs เนื้อหาพอดแคสต์ทั้งหมด รวมถึงตอน กราฟิก และคำอธิบายพอดแคสต์ได้รับการอัปโหลดและจัดหาให้โดยตรงจาก information labs and Information labs หรือพันธมิตรแพลตฟอร์มพอดแคสต์ของพวกเขา หากคุณเชื่อว่ามีบุคคลอื่นใช้งานที่มีลิขสิทธิ์ของคุณโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาต คุณสามารถปฏิบัติตามขั้นตอนที่แสดงไว้ที่นี่ https://th.player.fm/legal
Player FM - แอป Podcast
ออฟไลน์ด้วยแอป Player FM !

AI lab TL;DR | Kevin Frazier - How Smarter Copyright Law Can Unlock Fairer AI

16:51
 
แบ่งปัน
 

Manage episode 475626213 series 3480798
เนื้อหาจัดทำโดย information labs and Information labs เนื้อหาพอดแคสต์ทั้งหมด รวมถึงตอน กราฟิก และคำอธิบายพอดแคสต์ได้รับการอัปโหลดและจัดหาให้โดยตรงจาก information labs and Information labs หรือพันธมิตรแพลตฟอร์มพอดแคสต์ของพวกเขา หากคุณเชื่อว่ามีบุคคลอื่นใช้งานที่มีลิขสิทธิ์ของคุณโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาต คุณสามารถปฏิบัติตามขั้นตอนที่แสดงไว้ที่นี่ https://th.player.fm/legal

🔍 In this TL;DR episode, Kevin Frazier (University of Texas at Austin school of Law) outlines a proposal to realign U.S. copyright law with its original goal of spreading knowledge. The discussion introduces three key reforms—an AI training presumption, research safe harbors, and data commons—to help innovators access data more easily. By reducing legal ambiguity, the proposals aim to support responsible AI development and level the playing field for startups and researchers.

📌 TL;DR Highlights

⏲️[00:00] Intro

⏲️[00:40] Q1-How do copyright laws limit AI’s training data and knowledge diffusion?

⏲️[04:05] Q2-How does the original intent of the Intellectual Property Clause conflict with current copyright rules?

⏲️[10:35] Q3-What reforms could align copyright with promoting science?

⏲️[15:36] Wrap-up & Outro

💭 Q1 - How do copyright laws limit AI’s training data and knowledge diffusion?

🗣️ "Copyright law was designed to promote knowledge creation. Now it functions as a bottleneck in that knowledge ecosystem."

🗣️ "Today's AI systems face a paradoxical constraint: they require vast oceans of human-created content to learn, and yet our copyright framework increasingly cordons off those essential waters."

🗣️ "Early publishers faced guild restrictions and royal monopolies that limited the dissemination of knowledge. Today's AI developers are navigating a similarly restrictive landscape through the barriers of copyright law."

🗣️ "When there's ambiguity in the law, that hinders innovation. It leads to litigation and poses a real threat to startups trying to determine whether they can use copyrighted information for training."

💭 Q2 - How does the original intent of the Intellectual Property Clause conflict with current copyright rules?

🗣️ "The IP clause starts off with a mandate that Congress spread knowledge. If something isn’t promoting the progress of science, then it can’t be interpreted as constitutional."

🗣️ "Copyright began as a 14-year term. Now it's expanded to more than 70 years — a huge restriction on the ability to spread knowledge."

🗣️ "The founders hated monopolies. They’d seen how royal prerogatives were used to quash innovation — and tried to create a better system for incentivizing knowledge."

🗣️ "AI tools are unparalleled in their ability to create knowledge. The question now is: can we spread that knowledge?"

🗣️ "The Constitution’s goal wasn’t just to reward creators — it was to spread science and useful arts as far and wide as possible."

💭 Q3 - What reforms could align copyright with promoting science?

🗣️ "We need a clear statutory presumption that using works for machine learning constitutes fair use — that sort of clarity is essential for startups and research institutions to compete."

🗣️ "Without robust datasets, the positive use cases of AI — from public health breakthroughs to AI tutors for differently-abled students — simply aren’t possible."

🗣️ "Imagine if all that data your smartwatch gathers went toward training AI models tailored to the public good — that’s the promise of data commons."

🗣️ "AI is like fire: it can spread and fuel incredible progress — but if we smother it with fire extinguishers too soon, only the biggest players will be able to benefit."

🗣️ "We must make sure this isn’t a world where only OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google build the models — we need a future with many options and many positive use cases of AI."

📌 About Our Guest

🎙️ Kevin Frazier | the University of Texas at Austin School of Law

🌐 Article | Progress Interrupted: The Constitutional Crisis in Copyright Law

https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/progress-interrupted-the-constitutional-crisis-in-copyright-law

🌐 Kevin Frazier

https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-frazier-51811737/

Kevin Frazier is an AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the Austin School of Law of the University of Texas. He is also a Contributing Editor at Lawfare, a non-profit publication and he developed the first open-source Law and AI syllabus.

#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #GenerativeAI

  continue reading

33 ตอน

Artwork
iconแบ่งปัน
 
Manage episode 475626213 series 3480798
เนื้อหาจัดทำโดย information labs and Information labs เนื้อหาพอดแคสต์ทั้งหมด รวมถึงตอน กราฟิก และคำอธิบายพอดแคสต์ได้รับการอัปโหลดและจัดหาให้โดยตรงจาก information labs and Information labs หรือพันธมิตรแพลตฟอร์มพอดแคสต์ของพวกเขา หากคุณเชื่อว่ามีบุคคลอื่นใช้งานที่มีลิขสิทธิ์ของคุณโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาต คุณสามารถปฏิบัติตามขั้นตอนที่แสดงไว้ที่นี่ https://th.player.fm/legal

🔍 In this TL;DR episode, Kevin Frazier (University of Texas at Austin school of Law) outlines a proposal to realign U.S. copyright law with its original goal of spreading knowledge. The discussion introduces three key reforms—an AI training presumption, research safe harbors, and data commons—to help innovators access data more easily. By reducing legal ambiguity, the proposals aim to support responsible AI development and level the playing field for startups and researchers.

📌 TL;DR Highlights

⏲️[00:00] Intro

⏲️[00:40] Q1-How do copyright laws limit AI’s training data and knowledge diffusion?

⏲️[04:05] Q2-How does the original intent of the Intellectual Property Clause conflict with current copyright rules?

⏲️[10:35] Q3-What reforms could align copyright with promoting science?

⏲️[15:36] Wrap-up & Outro

💭 Q1 - How do copyright laws limit AI’s training data and knowledge diffusion?

🗣️ "Copyright law was designed to promote knowledge creation. Now it functions as a bottleneck in that knowledge ecosystem."

🗣️ "Today's AI systems face a paradoxical constraint: they require vast oceans of human-created content to learn, and yet our copyright framework increasingly cordons off those essential waters."

🗣️ "Early publishers faced guild restrictions and royal monopolies that limited the dissemination of knowledge. Today's AI developers are navigating a similarly restrictive landscape through the barriers of copyright law."

🗣️ "When there's ambiguity in the law, that hinders innovation. It leads to litigation and poses a real threat to startups trying to determine whether they can use copyrighted information for training."

💭 Q2 - How does the original intent of the Intellectual Property Clause conflict with current copyright rules?

🗣️ "The IP clause starts off with a mandate that Congress spread knowledge. If something isn’t promoting the progress of science, then it can’t be interpreted as constitutional."

🗣️ "Copyright began as a 14-year term. Now it's expanded to more than 70 years — a huge restriction on the ability to spread knowledge."

🗣️ "The founders hated monopolies. They’d seen how royal prerogatives were used to quash innovation — and tried to create a better system for incentivizing knowledge."

🗣️ "AI tools are unparalleled in their ability to create knowledge. The question now is: can we spread that knowledge?"

🗣️ "The Constitution’s goal wasn’t just to reward creators — it was to spread science and useful arts as far and wide as possible."

💭 Q3 - What reforms could align copyright with promoting science?

🗣️ "We need a clear statutory presumption that using works for machine learning constitutes fair use — that sort of clarity is essential for startups and research institutions to compete."

🗣️ "Without robust datasets, the positive use cases of AI — from public health breakthroughs to AI tutors for differently-abled students — simply aren’t possible."

🗣️ "Imagine if all that data your smartwatch gathers went toward training AI models tailored to the public good — that’s the promise of data commons."

🗣️ "AI is like fire: it can spread and fuel incredible progress — but if we smother it with fire extinguishers too soon, only the biggest players will be able to benefit."

🗣️ "We must make sure this isn’t a world where only OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google build the models — we need a future with many options and many positive use cases of AI."

📌 About Our Guest

🎙️ Kevin Frazier | the University of Texas at Austin School of Law

🌐 Article | Progress Interrupted: The Constitutional Crisis in Copyright Law

https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/progress-interrupted-the-constitutional-crisis-in-copyright-law

🌐 Kevin Frazier

https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-frazier-51811737/

Kevin Frazier is an AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the Austin School of Law of the University of Texas. He is also a Contributing Editor at Lawfare, a non-profit publication and he developed the first open-source Law and AI syllabus.

#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #GenerativeAI

  continue reading

33 ตอน

ทุกตอน

×
 
Loading …

ขอต้อนรับสู่ Player FM!

Player FM กำลังหาเว็บ

 

คู่มืออ้างอิงด่วน

ฟังรายการนี้ในขณะที่คุณสำรวจ
เล่น