Manage episode 288053749 series 2858554
Identity Crisis Episode 9: Logical Fallacies
This week on Identity Crisis, we talk about some logical/argumentative fallacies and how they might pertain to the gender debate and identity politics in general.
Read more on 4W: https://4w.pub/identity-crisis-logical-fallacies
The fallacies we cover are:
2. Proof by assertion / argument from repetition
3. Affirming the consequent (invalidly inferring the converse of a statement)
4. Magical thinking
5. Nirvana fallacy
6. Slippery slope
7. Red herring
links: List of fallacies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
"Trans Rights Debate with Ashley Routh & Sarah Phillimore": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzm_KxTiLB8&t=0s
"Pronouns are Rohypnol": https://fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns
“Identity Crisis” is a new weekly show for young people struggling with the modern orthodoxy of gender identity ideology—developed in collaboration between Plebity and 4W by Sasha White and M. K. Fain.
Each week, we will answer one or two of your questions, both as a running column on 4W, and in the form of a video podcast.
To submit a question, email us at: firstname.lastname@example.org. We may publish your question in full, so be sure to leave out or change any identifying details if you would like to remain anonymous. Or specify that your question is private and you would rather we discuss it in a general way.
The music in this episode is:
Son of a Rocket by Kevin MacLeod