Us Supreme Court สาธารณะ
[search 0]
เพิ่มเติม

ดาวน์โหลดแอปเลย!

show episodes
 
Loading …
show series
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Biden administration must continue to enforce Trump’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they await hearing in U.S. immigration court.
 
A case in which the Court will consider whether a public school’s attempt to avoid an Establishment Clause claim by forbidding a coach from praying with students during and after a game violates the coach’s rights under the Constitution or Title VII.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Bankruptcy Judgeship Act violates the uniformity requirement of the Constitution's Bankruptcy Clause by increasing quarterly fees solely in districts under the U.S. Trustee program and not in those under the Bankruptcy Administrator program.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot raise representative claims, including under the California Private Attorneys General Act.
 
A case in which the Court affirmed, via an equally divided Court, that a train that makes a temporary stop in a railyard as part of its unitary journey in interstate commerce is not “in use” and therefore not subject to the Locomotive Inspection Act.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether an airline employee who works as a ramp agent supervisor is a “transportation worker” and therefore not required to arbitrate her wage dispute with the airline.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal law that gives district courts the discretion to order someone in that district to give testimony or produce documents “for use in a foreign or international tribunal” applies to private commercial arbitral tribunals.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether, under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, courts are required to consider all measures that might mitigate the grave risk of harm if the child were to return to their country of habitual residence.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the arbitration-specific requirement that the proponent of a contractual waiver defense prove prejudice violates the Supreme Court’s instruction that lower courts must “place arbitration agreements on an equal footing with other contracts.”
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether an individual can sue federal officers for First Amendment retaliation claims or for allegedly violating the individual’s Fourth Amendment rights while engaging in immigration-related functions.
 
A case in which the Court will resolve a dispute over the interpretation of the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, which prohibits health plans from treating individuals with kidney failure differently in terms of eligibility or access to benefits.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether a physician may be convicted of unlawful distribution under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) even if he “reasonably believed” or “subjectively intended” that his prescriptions fall within that course of professional practice.
 
A case in which the Court will consider whether the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in virtually any industry, so long as it considers cost, non-air impacts, and energy requirements.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act provides the Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities (including bingo) on its lands.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether an individual can be prosecuted in the Court of Indian Offenses and also in federal court for the same offense without violating the Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause.
 
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether appellees have standing to challenge the statutory loan-repayment limit of 52 U.S.C. 30116(j); and (2) whether the loan-repayment limit violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments when deciding whether to “impose a reduced sentence” on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018.
 
A case in which the Court held that a federal court hearing state-law claims under the FSIA should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party.
 
A case in which the Court held that the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the Tax Court of a notice of determination from the commissioner of internal revenue in 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d)(1) is not a jurisdictional requirement and thus is subject to equitable tolling.
 
One of two cases on the docket for this term in which the Court will decide whether noncitizens who have spent more than six months in immigration detention awaiting resolution of their deportation withholding claim are entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge to determine whether they can be released on bond.…
 
One of two cases on the docket for this term in which the Court will decide whether noncitizens who have spent more than six months in immigration detention awaiting resolution of their deportation withholding claim are entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge to determine whether they can be released on bond.…
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the federal Medicaid Act provides for a state Medicaid program to recover reimbursement for Medicaid’s payment of a beneficiary’s past medical expenses by taking funds from the portion of the beneficiary’s tort recovery that compensates for future medical expenses.…
 
A case in which the Court blocked the Occupational Safety & Health Administration’s challenged rule mandating that employers with at least 100 employees require covered workers to receive a COVID–19 vaccine or else wear a mask and be subject to weekly testing.
 
A case in which the Court allowed the Biden administration to enforce nationwide a rule requiring health care workers at facilities that participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they qualify for a medical or religious exemption.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether a state law prohibiting students participating in an otherwise generally available student-aid program from choosing to use their aid to attend schools that provide religious, or “sectarian,” instruction violates the Religion Clauses or Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.…
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) preserves the jurisdiction of federal courts to review a nondiscretionary determination that a noncitizen is ineligible for certain types of discretionary relief.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’s decision to lower drug reimbursement rates for certain hospitals based on acquisition costs is a reasonable interpretation of the Medicare statute.
 
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Department of Health and Human Services followed the correct procedures when it promulgated a rule changing the way it calculates Medicare reimbursement rates for hospitals.
 
A case in which the Court held that the Austin city code’s distinction between on-premise signs, which may be digitized, and off-premise signs, which may not, does not violate the First Amendment.
 
Loading …

คู่มืออ้างอิงด่วน

Google login Twitter login Classic login